Commit Diff

Commit:
44b7ff02fd34731c6ed0d552dbde5c9981d53127
From:
Alexander Barton <alex@barton.de>
Date:
Message:
Don't cloak already cloaked hostname when using METADATA A client for which a METADATA command has been received from one of its peers got the client flag "M" set. So it's safe to assume that such a client gets "METADATA host" commands for its cloaked hostname and the server must not cloak the hostname on its own, even when the client mode "+x" is set.
Actions:
Patch | Tree
commit - 35ed57e6c160dc13c2bbca2ca042406285d4ced3
commit + 44b7ff02fd34731c6ed0d552dbde5c9981d53127
blob - 92262b5d8b00c0ae3248c3010032ee8ff13ac0e1
blob + 2f8d771cc2ff81253cf62925757d7645ce39d539
--- src/ngircd/client.c
+++ src/ngircd/client.c
@@ -702,9 +702,16 @@ Client_HostnameCloaked(CLIENT *Client)
 
 	assert(Client != NULL);
 
+	/* Client isn't cloaked at all, return real hostname: */
 	if (!Client_HasMode(Client, 'x'))
 		return Client_Hostname(Client);
 
+	/* Client has received METADATA command, so it got the eventually
+	 * cloaked hostname set correctly and this server doesn't need
+	 * to cloak it on its own: */
+	if (strchr(Client_Flags(Client), 'M'))
+		return Client_Hostname(Client);
+
 	/* Do simple mapping to the server ID? */
 	if (!*Conf_CloakHostModeX)
 		return Client_ID(Client->introducer);